Research Article

Comparing some Traditional Western and African Conceptions of Personhood

Makotoka Kahaka
University of Botswana, Botswana.
* Corresponding author
Wazha Maundeni
University of Botswana, Botswana.
DOI icon 10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.5.308

Read Counter
530

Downloads
3172

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-08-02
Published 2022-10-10

Read counter = 530 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

This paper discusses the comparisons that have been made between traditional African and Western thoughts on the communitarian vis-à-vis individualistic conceptions of personhood where some dissimilarity between the two conceptions has been highlighted. While there has been a lot of emphasis on the dissimilarity that allegedly exists between the two camps, there has not been much discussion on the similarities or common features that may exist between the two camps regarding the concept of personhood. Focusing on a selected number of scholars, this paper discusses the comparisons that have been made between the traditional African and Western thoughts on the concept of personhood with a view to exploring if any similarities or areas of convergence exist between the two. The paper concludes that in addition to the differences in thought between the two camps on the concept of personhood, there are also some similarities that are worth noting.

Keywords: African Thought, Communitarian, Individualism, Personhood, Western Thought.

References

  1. Bell, R. (2002). Understanding African Philosophy; A Cross-cultural Approach to Classical and Contemporary Issues. New York: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  2. Daly, M. (1994). Communitarianism: A new public ethics. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
     Google Scholar
  3. Dube, M. W. (2006). Adinkra! Four Hearts Joined Together. On Becoming Healing-Teachers of African Indigenous Religion/s in HIV&AIDS Prevention. African Women, Religion, and Health. Essays in honor of Mercy Amba Ewudziwa Oduyoye. Maryknoll, NY, 131-156.
     Google Scholar
  4. Etzioni, A. (2014). The common good. John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  5. Harrison-Barbet, A. (1990). Mastering Philosophy, London: Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  6. Horner, C. & Westacott, E. (2000). Thinking through Philosophy; An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  7. Hountondji, P.J. (2002). An alienated literature in P.H. Coetzee & A.P.J. Roux, (Eds.), Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings (pp. 125-136). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  8. Kernohan, A. (1998). Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ikuenobe, P. (2006). The idea of personhood in Chinua Achebe’s Things fall apart. Philosophia Africana, 9(2), 117-131.
     Google Scholar
  10. Long, R. T. (2007). The classical roots of radical individualism. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24(02), 262-297.
     Google Scholar
  11. Mbiti, J. S, (1969). African Religions and Philosophy. London: Heinemann Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  12. Menkiti, I. A, (1984). Person and community in African traditional thought in R.A Wright (Ed.), African Philosophy: An Introduction (pp. 171-181). Washington: University Press of America.
     Google Scholar
  13. Mkhize, N. (2004). Psychology: An African perspective. In D. Hook (Ed.), Critical Psychology, (pp. 24-52). Lansdowne, Cape Town: UCT press.
     Google Scholar
  14. Okolo, C. B. (2002). Self as a Problem in African Thought in P.H. Coetzee & A.P.J. Roux, (Eds.), Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings. (pp. 209-218). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  15. Stumpf, E. S. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  16. Tempels, R. P. (1959). Bantu Philosophy. Paris: Presence Africaine.
     Google Scholar
  17. Wilkinson, J.R. (2002). South African Women and the Ties that Bind in P.H. Coetzee & A.P.J. Roux, (Eds.), Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings. (pp.343-360). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar